Those suing to get compensation for personal injury have been enjoying some judicial exemptions in the past but all that has come to the end with the implementation of the new judicial price hike. It was adjudged in the best interest of the judicial process. The claimants of personal injury compensation have to think twice before filing a case in the law court due to the enormous charge enforced in the US.
Payment used to be deducted from the paid compensation
Those suing to get compensation for personal injury in the past had no need to worry about payment of their attorney because the payment would only be made to them after the resolution of the case and only if the case was positively resolved. This was the life line that allowed many people who have acquired occupational injury to approach the court of law for a redress.
Suing party would need to pay some money upfront
In the new policy, those who want to sue for compensation for personal injury would need to pay £10,000 pounds upfront before an attorney would agree to handle the case. This fee it was understood would not affect the cases already on the table of lawyers; rather it would take effect from the new cases.
The new price hike would help run the judicial process easily
The new price hike came to effect after the House of Lords approve of it. According to Justice Minister, Lord Faulks, the new hike would rake in up to £120 million in the Government treasury and was necessary to fund the court services while also arguing that it would not affect the majority of cases on ground.
There are both positive and negative criticisms to the policy
One of the people against the new policy was Lord Pannick who was the opinion that such a policy would greatly affect the access of justice by both small businesses and personal injury claimants because most of them would not be able to afford such upfront payment. In his speech, he stressed this point by saying, “it was perverse for the government to dispute that so many small businesses and personal injury claimants are going to be unable to pay an upfront £10,000 fee as the price to access the court. It would do inevitable and substantial damage to access to justice.”
The new policy is still under contention
Lord Pannick has continued to push for the policy to be ruled unlawful in the court which will then see a reversal to what was formerly in practice. Following the dispute, the Law Society launched a judicial review against the new policy, terming it as unpopular among the law profession.
The masses have a different view of the situation
As would be expected, majority of the masses had that opinion aligned to that of Lord Pannick. Some threw a jibe at Cameron and Clegg, terming their Britain as a place where justice is reserved for the rich and affluent in the society.
The hike will definitely reduce the amount of people seeking justice
If the hike is allowed to stay, it will definitely affect the dispensation of justice because the majority of people going for claims from personal injury are the poor who could not afford their treatment or struggle through their treatment.
- There is a deliberation to have personal injury claimants pay £10,000 upfront.
- Personal injury claimants used to pay only after case has been resolved.
- The new hike is intended to increase the revenue of the government.
- The running of the court would be covered from the proceeds of the hike.
- Lord Pannick argued that it must affect the dispensation of justice.
- The Law Society has begun a review of the policy.
- Majority of personal injury claimants are not able to afford the upfront pay.
- Lord Pannick is fighting to have the policy declared unlawful.
- Some rants vent their anger at Cameron and Clegg.
- Majority of cases would not be affected by the new policy.
No related posts.
Bookmark This Page (Ctrl + D)